Monday, August 23, 2021

The orbit of Planet Nine

 Five and a half years after our proposal of the existence of Planet Nine, we have finally accomplished what is perhaps the most important task in aiding the search: we now know where to look.  We've had a pretty good general idea for years now, but we couldn't really give a full assessment of the range of uncertainties for where in the sky Planet Nine might be, how massive it might be, and how bright it might be. Now we can. You can read all of the details here.

Figuring all of this out sounds somewhat straight forward. Our task is simply to take the observations of all of the distant Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) whose orbits are affected by Planet Nine and use those to determine everything we possibly can. It only took five years. 

You can read the full paper for the details, but the five years consisted of a couple of critical steps:

  • Understand the physics. Until we had explored all of the various ways that P9 affects objects in the outer solar system, we didn't know which objects were most critical for constraining properties of P9. Many objects are more influenced by Neptune than by P9; if we had included those the signal from P9 would basically be washed out.
  • Understand the observations. There has been a lot of talk of observational bias in the population of objects in the outer solar system. Why? Because there is a lot of bias. Without fully characterizing the bias, we would have a difficult time disentangling what we are seeing from just the simple bias.
  • Understand how changes to parameters of Planet Nine change the outer solar system. We accomplished this through a huge number of numerical simulations where we placed a bunch of objects in the outer solar system, added the 4 giant planets, and then added different incarnations of Planet Nine, and watched the outer solar system evolve. Every parameters of Planet Nine (almost) has huge impacts on the outer solar system. Which is good, since that means we have leverage to learn about Planet Nine from the outer solar system.
  • Figure out a statistical treatment to compare the observations and the simulations. In practice this meant creating a maximum likelihood model combining the simulations, the bias, and the observations of each relevant object. 
  • Put it all together! Using the maximum likelihood model and what appears to be everyone's favorite statistic technique (MCMC), we now have probability distributions of all of the Planet Nine parameters.

Sorry it took so long.

Here are some fun numbers from the analysis. Planet Nine has a mass of  6.2/+2.2/-1.3 Earth masses, a semimajor axis of 380/+140/-80 AU, and inclination of 16+/-5 degrees,  and perihelion of 300/+85/-60 AU. We can turn all of that into a map of where to look in the sky and of how bright and far away Planet Nine would be at any position in the sky (brightness depends on some assumption; you might want to read the detail in the paper).


That plot on top if a full-sky view going from 360 to 0 in Right Ascension. The equator, ecliptic, and +/-15 degrees of the galactic plane are shown, if that helps to orient you. The colors show the probability of find P9 at any point in the sky. The highest probability is near aphelion, around ~60 degrees in RA, pretty close to the galactic plane. Not surprisingly, this is where we have been concentrating with our Subaru search. The bottom two panes show the distance and brightness. The median distance at aphelion is around 500 AU. The median brightness is around 22nd magnitude. There is a lot of room for variation however! At its brightest predicted magnitude, P9 could be found in many ongoing all-sky surveys. At its faintest, it will require dedicated searches with large telescopes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That plot above is truly the point of the whole paper, but there are two more plots of which I am a big fan so I want to share these also. 

As mentioned earlier, there had been a lot of discussion of bias and its effect on what we see in the outer solar system. I am here to tell you bias is real. Also I am here to show you that it doesn't cause the clustering that we see.


 

Here is a plot that shows a lot of things all at the same time. First, lets concentrate on the green points. Those are 11 real objects in the sky and they show those objects semimajor axis ("a") versus their longitude of perihelion aka the direction their orbits point in space aka "delta varpi". The fact that 10 of those 11 are aligned is the whole reason we are here. 

But wait! There is bias. Maybe those are all lined up like that simply because that's where people have looked? Now look at the blue bars. These show, for each object, the probability of the object having been found at all values of longitude of perihelion if the true longitudes of perihelion were distributed uniformly in space. There are two major regions of bias. One is at longitude of perihelion of ~90, and a weaker one is at ~300. These are caused by the DES and OSSOS surveys which both looked in very specific directions and found many objects. But that's not where the cluster is! 

Now look at the red in the background. This shows how the green points should be distributed if Planet Nine were out there messing things up. Looks pretty good, no?

OK, one more:

This is the same general idea as above, but now we are plotting the pole position of the orbit of each of the distant objects. A point right in the middle has an orbital plane exactly the same as the planets, a point displaced in any direction from the center is tilted, and the direction of displacement tells the direction of the tilt. As you can see from the green points, the real objects have, on average, about a 15 degree tilt towards zero. Red again shows the Planet Nine prediction. Blue shows the biases. The biases here look weird and spider webby, again mostly because of DES and OSSOS. There is a lot of bias, and the observations generally fal along the lines of bias. But the bias clearly cannot account for the fact that the orbits are tilted and that they are tilted in one direction.

Put these two plots together and you get a 99.6% chance that the objects are clustered, rather than uniform. That sounds pretty good to me.

--------------------------------------------------------------

The paper has even more inside (at 26 pages believe me, there is a lot more), but these are my favorite highlights. I think of that first plot as the Planet Nine Treasure Map. Time to start hunting, my fellow pirates.



28 comments:

  1. Mike, why have you left out 2014 WB556 from your latest paper? After all, it's perihelion is 42.7 AU and it's major axis is 296.5 AU so 2014 WB556 falls within your q > 42 AU; a >150 AU window? It also seems to fit your existing group quiet well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Konstantin calculated 2014 WB556 as meta-stable in the previous blog post, yet you both seem to have now changed your minds. Why? Granted, 2014 WB556 does slightly widen your clustering in Longitude of Perihelion, but not by much. I would think that keeping it would slightly reduce the overall statistical uncertainty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. On page 19 you mention 2013FT29. I think you meant to say 2013FT28. Very nice paper, BTW.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can understand the rationale for excluding ETNOs recently scattered by Neptune. However, how do you decide to throw out one meta-stable ETNO and yet keep another met-stable ETNO in the group?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mike, first comments also apply to 2018 VM35. It was used in the prior post by Batygin, but left out of your latest paper. It's a stable ETNO with a perihelion is 45.0 AU, well within your 42 AU cutoff. Is this object also contaminated by Neptune? Again, what is the rationale for excluding it? It's inclusion would also slightly broaden your Longitude of Perihelion clustering. Without some simulation/modeling of these transitional objects to lay the foundation for rejecting them due to Neptune-contamination, it opens up the issue of "cherry picking" objects to give the tightest clustering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2018 VM35's observation arc is only 417 days leaving it with a fairly large uncertainty in its orbital elements.

      Delete
    2. OK, yet Batygin has classified this object as "stable" in the prior post. So either he's "jumped the gun," or he knows something that you don't. Agmartin, I'm just trying to get clarity on what "recently contaminated by Neptune's gravity" really means.

      Delete
    3. Doesn't it bother you that B&B say that excluding these two additional objects allows for a more accurate "Treasure Map" of Planet Nine, but they don't show any analysis in their paper to support their argument?

      Delete
    4. What I favor is weighting every ETNO based on the certainty of it's orbit, and the time since the ETNO was last influenced by Neptune's gravity, normalized by the time the detached ETNOs have been last influenced by Neptune's gravity. That way you can keep all the ETNO's and weight them accordingly. This is a sparse data set (only 16 ETNO's), and throwing out two ETNOs, when they fit into the selection window, doesn't make a lot of sense to me unless you justify doing so. BTW, I have no problem with 2015 TG387 being classified as an IOC object.

      Delete
  6. Looks like we won't find it till the Vera Rubin gets fully operational. Should be soon enough!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Getting to know about your articles, they are indeed very helpful when it comes to seek guidance. I hope you will not cease this amazing work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "It only took five years." Good work. "Sorry it took so long." Dont be in the least. This is ground breaking work, done well. " I hope you will not cease this amazing work. " I hope not either. I would like to see some simulations, but... its just me.

    Neptune took a while to be discovered, and now you are reaching far far beyond it.

    Sign me still perturbed about Pluto's demotion.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 365SBOBET Situs Agen Sbobet, Agen Bola Terpercaya di Indonesia

    365sbobet adalah Agen SBOBET Terpercaya Indonesia, Situs Agen Bola Resmi Online Casino Terbaik Official Partner kami adalah Barcelona dan Liverpool.

    365Sbobet
    Agen Sbobet
    Agen Sbobet Online
    Agen Sbobet Terpercaya
    Agen Sbobet Indonesia
    Agen Sbobet Asia
    Agen Sbobet Resmi
    Agen Sbobet Mobile
    Daftar Agen Sbobet
    Situs Agen Sbobet
    Website Agen Sbobet
    Link ALternatif Agen Sbobet
    Bonus Agen Sbobet
    Sbobet
    Sbobet Online
    Sbobet Terpercaya
    Sbobet Indonesia
    Sbobet Asia
    Sbobet Resmi
    Sbobet Mobile
    Daftar Sbobet
    Situs Sbobet
    Website Sbobet
    Link ALternatif Sbobet
    Bonus SbobetAgen Bola
    Agen Bola Online
    Agen Bola Terpercaya
    Agen Bola Indonesia
    Agen Bola Asia,
    Agen Bola Resmi
    Agen Bola Mobile
    Daftar Agen Bola
    Situs Agen Bola
    Website Agen Bola
    Link ALternatif Agen Bola
    Bonus Agen Bola
    Agen Slot
    Main Slot
    Situs Sbobet
    Situs Slot
    Slot
    Slot Online
    Slot Terbaik
    Website Slot

    ReplyDelete
  10. If this Planet does exist(not bloody likely), I propose it be classified as Planet 37 until given a proper name. After the great 8, the others are as follows : Ceres, Pluto, Eris, Makemake, Haumea, Gonggong, Quaoar, Sedna, Orcus, Salacia, 2002MS4,Varda, Ixion, Varuna, G!kunll'homdima, Chaos, 2002 AW197, 2003AZ84, 2002 UX25, 2013 FY27, 2004 GV9, 2015 RR245, 2014 UZ224, 2018 VG18, 2005 RN43, 2005 UQ513, 2014 EZ51, and 2010 RF43.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your list of astrophysical planets leave most of debris out for unknown reasons.

      But the listed objects are not of much historical - no inclusion of Sun - or astronomical - no limitation to astronomical planets - interest.

      Astronomical planets on the other hand are well defined and lists the primary gravitational objects in a system - the clearing object criteria differs 3 orders of magnitude between planets and non-planets [see the IAU material on planets]. And those objects can be observed in stable solar systems (having had clearing time) to a current count of thousands.

      Delete
  11. Aslijudi Situs Judi Online Terbaik Dan Terpercaya Dengan Tingkat Keamanan Dan Kenyamanan Yang Sangat Terjamin.
    Tingkat Winrate yang Sangat Tinggi Dengan Kemudahan jackpot Terbesar.

    Prediksi Parlay
    Livescore

    ReplyDelete
  12. I read your website articles frequently and I really appreciate your each post information. This is unbelievable information has really peaked my interest. I will bookmark your website for future updates and keep checking for new details about once per week. Thank you so much buddy, Have a good day. Assignment Help Australia - Assignment Help Perth - Assignment Help - Assignment Help in Melbourne

    ReplyDelete
  13. I downloaded the "Star Walk 2" App off play store...When you star search "planet nine", it comes up located write next too 'Orion /then 'Belegeuse and 'Rigel is just below...???
    Which is kinda baffling being you guys are publicly saying still not located... Nevertheless figure I try to get an answer???
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well done, and thanks for all the hard and sustained work!

    Now I need to read the paper until further comments (or not).

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think we should re-define 8 'major' planets and then the 'dwarf planets' as planets also. I get that Pluto hasn't cleared it's orbit, is tilted 17 degrees from the ecliptic plane, etc. but New Horizons showed it has characteristics of a planet, not some Arrokoth asteroid. And make Ceres and Eris planets too, any large enough to be spherical.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I responded at length to bcsbuster, the majority of astronomical planets that we can observe beg to differ from the astrophysical definition, whether spherical and/or differentiated or not. Dwarf planets may be interesting of themselves, but astronomers wouldn't count them since our knowledge has moved on. [Indeed, individual debris objects would be practically uncountable in any system.] And why should they - if they didn't keep up, Sun would still be 'a planet'.

      Delete
  16. Nice! Very informative post. Facing problems in completing your academic assignment writing? Get assignment help by visiting our forum. You will get plagiarism free data within the stipulated date. To know more, browse our website.

    ReplyDelete
  17. How to improve vision in 7 days Those of us who wear glasses or contact lenses often worry about our decreased vision and ask
    Health and Social Care What is health? Health is our physical state, be it very good, good, or bad. The state of our health

    ReplyDelete
  18. Outstanding data, You have good ability of writing and know how to attract the many readers with your words and thoughts. That is a very good tip particularly to those fresh to the article post. Simple but very accurate subject info. Thankyou very much for sharing this one and trust me its so master piece. A must read release! pharmacology assignment help - property law assignment help - customer relationship management assignment help - oracle assignment help

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yuk Gabung di NAGAQQ: AGEN BANDARQ BANDARQ ONLINE ADUQ ONLINE DOMINOQQ TERBAIK

    Yang Merupakan Agen Bandarq, Domino 99, Dan Bandar Poker Online Terpercaya di asia hadir untuk anda semua dengan permainan permainan menarik dan bonus menarik untuk anda semua

    Bonus yang diberikan NagaQQ :
    * Bonus rollingan 0.5%,setiap senin di bagikannya
    * Bonus Refferal 10% + 10%,seumur hidup
    * Bonus Jackpot, yang dapat anda dapatkan dengan mudah
    * Minimal Depo 15.000
    * Minimal WD 20.000

    Games Yang di Hadirkan NagaQQ :
    * Poker Online
    * BandarQ
    * Domino99
    * Bandar Poker
    * Bandar66
    * Sakong
    * Capsa Susun
    * AduQ
    * Perang Bacarrat
    * Perang Dadu
    * BD QQ (New Game)
    Menyediakan deposit Via E-Money
    Seperti : OVO, Dana , Gopay, Link aja ,dll

    Info Lebih lanjut Kunjungi :
    Website : NagaQQ
    Facebook : NagaQQ Official
    Kontakk : Info NagaQQ
    linktree : Agen Judi Online
    WHATSAPP : +6287833350051
    Line : Cs_nagaQQ
    TELEGRAM : +855967014811

    ReplyDelete
  20. When vashikaran is used then a person must understand that any problem of that person can be solved. Situations always make a person dumb. Sometimes a frustrating situation makes a person so disturb that they even stop the hope of ending their problem. But when a person searches for Vashikaran specialist near me they surely find out something good. A person can get the details of the best Vashikaran Specialist. This could be the fine way for a person to make their life good. It is the way the problems of a person can get solve and things become better for them forever.
    Swami Ji has been solving the life troubles of people globally. With years of practice and persistence, he is now equipped with the in-depth knowledge of vashikaran. Here, we will explore how Vashikaran Specialist Aghori Baba Ji helps to solve life problems.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hello there I'm a specialized Assistance on the off chance that you dealing with any issue in regards to any product, antivirus so you get in get together with us:
    logincoinbase | coinbase login

    ReplyDelete